tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post5333907016051812100..comments2024-02-29T10:32:20.159+02:00Comments on chestii livreşti - un blog de cărţi : decadentissimo sau enciclopedia decadenţeidragoş chttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16286505260218667681noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-29364089040519765042010-06-18T21:10:22.212+03:002010-06-18T21:10:22.212+03:00@strelnikov - aha, asta era mammeter...@strelnikov - aha, asta era mammeter...dragoş chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16286505260218667681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-69291202844405841762010-06-18T20:56:15.255+03:002010-06-18T20:56:15.255+03:00@dragos: "?" era apropos de mammeter sau...@dragos: "?" era apropos de mammeter sau ce :)<br /><br />if so, tre sa divulg ca mereu pe blogu tau dau peste cuvinte de verificare [la postare, oferite de blogger] bizare, in a positive way<br /><br />@als: de gustibus monsieur. insa pe mine wilde ma entuziasmeaza doar ca autor de dialoguri & paradoxe, in rest Portretul mi se pare cam carpaceala [si nu e vorba de contrastele intentionate & charming ale lui Huysmans ci pur si simplu de lipsa planului, imho]. aceeasi senzatie am avut'o si cu piesele lui.strelnikovhttp://tlonsociety.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-16542572488103510142010-06-18T20:38:04.711+03:002010-06-18T20:38:04.711+03:00@strelnikov - ?
@als - in sensul tezelor de la wi...@strelnikov - ?<br /><br />@als - in sensul tezelor de la wittenberg, in ceea ce priveste modernismul.dragoş chttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16286505260218667681noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-21631592462011561562010-06-18T19:41:39.065+03:002010-06-18T19:41:39.065+03:00dragos, cum adik 'bate in cuie modernismul'...dragos, cum adik 'bate in cuie modernismul'?!<br />pai 'modernismul' nici nu se intrevedea la orizont pe atunci... crek ai vrut sa scrii 'naturalismul'! ;P<br /><br />ps nu mi se pare k 'portretul lui dorian gray' ar fi o carte 'mai slaba' decit 'a rebours'... (mai celebra, cu siguranta!) 'a rebours' e mai mult o carte-cult (poate prima, in acceptia moderna a termenului)alsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-70684746415098220412010-06-18T18:07:26.738+03:002010-06-18T18:07:26.738+03:00..sau a mamelor, ca'n piesa the smiths:
i hav.....sau a mamelor, ca'n piesa the smiths:<br /><br />i have just discovered<br />some girls are bigger than others<br />some girls are bigger than others<br />cos some girl's mothers are bigger than<br />other girl's mothersstrelnikovnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7642358490183818730.post-71913177445117786222010-06-18T18:01:50.268+03:002010-06-18T18:01:50.268+03:00pai de cartea asta se poate vorbi infinit [incl in...pai de cartea asta se poate vorbi infinit [incl in contrast cu replica ei mai slaba & mai celebra, dorian g] vreau numa sa observ c'ai prins bine una din marile ei calitati - indeterminarea.. adica e "decandenta", ok, dar la fel de mult realista, ironica, eseu critic & manifest [contra?]revolutionar etc - si toate zonele astea se torpileaza & se completeaza reciproc magnific! <br /><br />pps: "mammeter" - ce cuvant de verificare! o machina pt cuantificarea milimetrica a mamiferelor, sau mamelelor?!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com